This will keep most traits between the two populations constant. The pattern we expect for recently diverged species, then, is one of mostly identical characteristics overlaid with only a smattering of differences. You might recall that it was exactly this pattern in its biogeographical context that caused Darwin to reflect on the possibility that species may not be stable :. Numerous instances could be given of this fact.
I will give only one, that of the Galapagos Archipelago, situated under the equator, between and miles from the shores of South America. Here almost every product of the land and water bears the unmistakeable stamp of the American continent. There are twenty-six land birds, and twenty-five of these are ranked by Mr. Gould as distinct species, supposed to have been created here; yet the close affinity of most of these birds to American species in every character, in their habits, gestures, and tones of voice, was manifest.
It was these observations that led Darwin to hypothesize that these finch species were the product of a speciation event brought on through geographic isolation. While geographic isolation is a straightforward situation that can lead to genetic barriers and the formation of new species, speciation can also occur without full separation.
Earlier, we examined the relatively simple case of geographic separation of populations such as a new population being founded on an island. As new alleles arise in separate populations, lack of interbreeding keeps each allele in the population where it arises.
These new alleles may contribute to speciation over time if they affect the characteristics of the organism. If, on the other extreme, new alleles can pass freely between two populations, then they will not contribute to a speciation event, since they will not make the two populations become more different over time.
While these two extremes geographically separated populations and fully continuous populations are straightforward to understand, it is possible to find situations that are shades of gray between them. They are able to exchange alleles between them, but at a reduced rate compared to sharing within each population.
This effect can arise due to the geographic shape of their habitat — if it is long and narrow, then the two populations may abut each other only along a small portion of their range.
This means that, on average, an individual from population A is more likely to find a mate within population A than to mate with a member of population B in their small area of overlap. We can represent this with boxes representing the two populations, abutting each other along one of their narrow sides:. This arrangement thus restricts, but does not completely abolish, allele flow between the two populations. In effect, this is a partial barrier to allele flow. Populations A and B are members of the same species, but the two populations are not genetically identical.
As new alleles arise in population A, they are not shared across to population B as often as they are shared within population A, and vice versa. As such, populations A and B may have different frequencies of any given allele, and may even have some alleles that the other population lacks all together.
Once populations become spread out over a wide geographic area, the differences between the populations at the extremities populations A and E in our diagram can become quite significant. In some cases, interestingly enough, the populations on the ends of the string can be different enough that they do not recognize each other as members of the same species , despite the fact that they are genetically connected through a series of intermediate populations.
In some cases, scientists need to bring members of the extreme populations together to see if they are able to interbreed i. In other cases, the topography of the habitat brings them together in nature, allowing the populations at the extremes of the string to meet each other around a ring, but with a natural barrier in the middle such as a mountain or a valley of unsuitable habitat. You can see the inherent difficulty for defining which populations are separate species, if indeed any are at all.
There is allele flow between all populations, but only around the ring. The two populations at the overlapping ends, despite encountering each other in the same habitat, are different enough that they do not interbreed. Defining these populations as separate species or not is a fruitless attempt to draw a line of demarcation on a gradient. For those interested in a real-life example of a ring species, the subspecies of the salamander Ensatina eschscholtzii on the west coast of North America are both a textbook case and a subject of ongoing research.
It is also easy to see what would follow if any of the bridging populations were lost, or if changes in habitat severed the connection between any of them — the result would be a break in the chain of allele flow, cutting the terminal populations off from one another.
What ring species illustrate is that though speciation is a slow process of accumulating differences between populations, it is possible even without a full barrier to allele flow. While ring species illustrate how species can form by partitioning variation out over a wide geographic area, it is also possible for barriers to allele flow to arise within a population in a more geographically compact location.
All that is needed is a bias that promotes allele exchange within a subgroup of the population at the expense of exchange with the wider population — and as we have seen with ring species, this barrier need not be absolute to allow two subpopulations to accumulate differences and diverge from one another over time. One way for this to occur is for subpopulations to begin to exploit resources within a common geographic area differently — an effect known as resource partitioning.
Since preferential breeding is a partial barrier to allele flow, this can place the two subpopulations on a genetic trajectory that reinforces their differences and leads to a speciation event.
Resource partitioning is the likely mechanism that drives multiple, rapid speciation events that occur when a founding population reaches a new habitat where competitors are largely absent. The colonization of volcanic islands, a topic we have discussed previously , can lead to adaptive radiation.
Full geographic separation, the partial geographic separation seen with ring species, and resource partitioning of subpopulations are all barriers to allele flow between what starts as members of the same species.
This provides the opportunity for new alleles to arise that are not shared between two populations, and shift the average characteristics of the two groups away from each other. Previously, we introduced the idea that species can form in the same geographic location based on resource partitioning—where the two populations become increasingly suited, over time, to exploit different niches.
These flies are attracted to the unripened fruits of hawthorns, a wild relative of domestic apples i. Hawthorn fruit is also where hawthorn flies find their mates and lay their eggs, to allow the larvae to feed on the fruit and cause it to spoil and fall early, with the larvae along for the ride.
Hawthorn flies produce only one generation per year, and survive the winter buried as pupae. Moreover, they have a short adult lifespan, giving them only a short period to find a mate, breed, and for the females to lay eggs. This crucial period, of course, is set by the life cycle of the hawthorn—when its fruit is available for the flies to use as a food source and meeting location.
As such, natural selection exerted by the hawthorn life cycle acts on genetic variation relevant to hatching time in hawthorn fly populations. The timing of hatching shows heritable variation, and flies that happen to hatch near the fringes of when hawthorn fruit is available or worse, when there is no fruit available at all do not reproduce as successfully as do flies that hatch when hawthorn fruit is abundant.
Not surprisingly, the result is that we observe populations of hawthorn flies that are well-timed with their host plants, with most members of any fly population hatching in concert with the height of fruit availability:. Hatching time is an example of a continuous trait, in contrast to a discontinuous trait. Discontinuous traits are traits that have distinct categories: black versus blue eyes, or red versus white flowers, and so on. Traits such as height and weight are examples of continuous traits, and the timing of hawthorn fly hatching is another.
The effect that the hawthorn tree has on the hawthorn fly is an example of stabilizing selection—fruit availability is selecting against flies that fall outside the boundaries on either side i. The overall effect is to keep fly hatching matched to fruit availability, generation after generation.
Something happened to upset this stable, balanced interaction, however: the introduction of domestic apples to North America by European colonists. As we noted above, hawthorns and apples are related plants, with somewhat similar fruits. One difference, however, was the timing of fruit development in apples compared to hawthorns: domestic apples produce fruit some weeks earlier than do hawthorns. In other words, once apples were present, the environment was no longer selecting fly populations in a stabilizing way, but rather acting to shape variation into two subpopulations.
The selection had now switched to being diversifying selection. Importantly, these two subpopulations were not diversifying only with respect to hatching time and food preference, but also given the nature of their biology with respect to mating preference. The result was a partial barrier to allele flow that would reinforce the nascent differences between the two groups over time. Not surprisingly, genes known from prior research to affect hatch timing show up as having different alleles in the two groups.
Other candidate genes include the receptor proteins the flies use to detect odors from their target fruits—with certain alleles more tuned to apple odors, and other alleles tuned to hawthorn odors. What started out as variation within one population has now been partitioned by selection into allele combinations suited to distinct niches—and given the short timeframe in which the switch to apples occurred, it is likely that new mutations did not play a role.
Rather, recombination and segregation of existing alleles of numerous genes was enough to provide genetic differences that suited some members of the original population to exploit the new opportunity. The net effect was the shifting of a few continuous traits hatch timing, fruit odor preference to match a new environmental niche and precipitate a barrier to allele flow. Having considered the genes and their alleles that were under selection during this speciation event, there are a few points to make.
The number of genes under selection and thus with different alleles in the two new species will be relatively rare. Only alleles that affect traits relevant to adaptation to the new niche will be affected.
Most genes will remain identical between the two populations, since they were not under diversifying selection, but continued to be under stabilizing selection for their identical role in both species. For example, consider genes required for cellular energy conversion or wing development—processes that both species still need to do in the exact same way.
These genes will have the same alleles or perhaps only one allele in both populations, since the function of these genes were not relevant to adapting to the new niche.
In short, the overall pattern that speciation produces will be a small smattering of differences in alleles for the genes under selection or genes that happened to experience drift by chance against a backdrop of the large majority of identical genes that were not subject to selection or drift.
Additionally, it shows that only a small handful of differences, derived from variation already existing within a population, can start two subpopulations on a trajectory that gradually improves the barrier to allele flow between them.
Over time, these effects can lead to the formation of closely related species. The production of closely-related species from a common ancestral population is hardly controversial among evangelical Christians, though the mechanisms underlying such events are not commonly appreciated.
What is more controversial for many, however, is the suggestion that these mechanisms also produce widely diverged species over greater spans of time. Join us to receive the latest articles, podcasts, videos, and more, and help us show how science and faith work hand in hand. Schwarz, D. Sympatric ecological speciation meets pyrosequencing: sampling the transcriptome of the apple maggot Rhagoletis pomonella. BMC Genomics 10; Taken together, the properties of DNA match what we observe in nature: faithful reproduction of form, but not perfect reproduction of form.
DNA replicating enzymes do not check to see if meaning i. Does human genetic variation today provide evidence that we can trace our ancestry exclusively from a single couple?
Biology, philosophy and religion work together to help us to understand the world we live in and to better know God. Part Three in the Uniquely unique mini-series.
We look to morality, language, and culture, and start to see that our species is quite an outlier. Author of "Thriving with Stone Age Minds," Justin Barrett responds to the reaction some people have to the idea of evolutionary psychology. Part Two in the Uniquely unique mini-series.
When we look for what makes humans unique on this planet, looking at our biology is an obvious first step. Genes and Alleles In the last post in this series, we examined how DNA variation arises as chance events, such as base-pair mismatches, duplications and deletions. Selection and drift So, DNA variation is all about the production of new alleles—but what happens to these alleles over time within a population?
These chance events shift the frequency of the two alleles quite significantly within one generation: Now imagine that the offspring pair up to mate, and that once again we have, by chance, a slightly non-representative sampling to form the next generation: The point is that this small population is prone to large fluctuations in the frequencies of the blue or yellow alleles because it is so small.
Changing allele frequencies and speciation Speciation is the production of two species from a common ancestral population. Review Previously, we made a number of points worth summarizing here: New alleles arise as unique events in individuals, but may become common in their population through various processes, including genetic drift and natural selection.
What goes around, comes around While these two extremes geographically separated populations and fully continuous populations are straightforward to understand, it is possible to find situations that are shades of gray between them. We can represent this with boxes representing the two populations, abutting each other along one of their narrow sides: This arrangement thus restricts, but does not completely abolish, allele flow between the two populations.
Speciation without geographic separation While ring species illustrate how species can form by partitioning variation out over a wide geographic area, it is also possible for barriers to allele flow to arise within a population in a more geographically compact location. Summing up — speciation starts as barriers to allele flow Full geographic separation, the partial geographic separation seen with ring species, and resource partitioning of subpopulations are all barriers to allele flow between what starts as members of the same species.
Not surprisingly, the result is that we observe populations of hawthorn flies that are well-timed with their host plants, with most members of any fly population hatching in concert with the height of fruit availability: Hatching time is an example of a continuous trait, in contrast to a discontinuous trait. Tempted by an apple Something happened to upset this stable, balanced interaction, however: the introduction of domestic apples to North America by European colonists.
Selection for the few Having considered the genes and their alleles that were under selection during this speciation event, there are a few points to make. In the long run The production of closely-related species from a common ancestral population is hardly controversial among evangelical Christians, though the mechanisms underlying such events are not commonly appreciated.
What is BioLogos? These diverse pre- and post-zygotic barriers are of great importance to speciation biologists because they determine how reproductively-isolated populations are from one another, which indicates how far along the often continuous process of speciation that populations are.
For example, reproductive isolation is weak in the early stages of speciation, but changes to strong or complete in later stages of speciation Figure 2. One or more of the many types of isolating mechanisms may play a role in the evolution of species along a continuum Figure 2. But how and why might reproductive barriers to genetic exchange evolve?
Figure 2: Schematic illustration of the continuous nature of divergence during speciation, with three arbitrary points along the speciation continuum depicted.
Numerous types of differentiation can vary quantitatively, with the magnitude of differentiation representing a measure of how far speciation has proceeded. Two headed arrows represent mating between individuals. All rights reserved. A major area of debate among speciation biologists is the geographic context in which it occurs Figure 3.
Ernst Mayr emphatically defended his view that speciation was most likely when populations became geographically isolated from one another, such that evolution within isolated populations would lead to enough differences among them that speciation would be an eventual outcome. The central idea here is that when populations are geographically separated, they will diverge from one another, both in the way they look and genetically.
These changes might occur by natural selection or by random chance i. This view of speciation of geographically isolated populations — termed allopatric speciation — is still widely held among speciation biologists as playing a major role in the evolution of biodiversity e. However, speciation might also occur in overlapping populations that are not geographically isolated i.
The problem here is how do populations that are living in the same area, and exchanging genes, diverge from one another? This could occur, for example, if insects adapted to living on different plants within the same geographic region Feder et al. It will be interesting to see how many new examples emerge now that the idea of sympatric speciation is becoming less controversial. Parapatric speciation refers to populations that are situated in geographic proximity to one another, usually with abutting but non-overlapping ranges.
Here, a small proportion of each population are in actual contact with one another, and thus considered in sympatry, whereas the majority of individuals reside far enough apart that frequent encounters with one another are rare Figure 3. There are putative examples of parapatric speciation in salamanders Niemiller et al. Reprinted from Mallet et al. The s saw a reclassification of modes of speciation away from schemes that focus solely on the geographic mode of divergence and towards a focus on the evolutionary process driving genetic divergence i.
This reclassification was motivated — at least in part — by renewed interest in the extent to which the evolutionary processes which cause adaptation within species also tend to create new species. Further, although the geographic mode of divergence has important implications for speciation via patterns of gene flow and sources of selection, speciation research has reached the point where we can directly test the role of different evolutionary process in driving speciation Butlin et al.
We outline several processes that can drive speciation. Recent years have seen renewed efforts to address these questions.
For example, populations living in different ecological environments e. These same evolutionary changes can also result in the populations evolving into separate species. For example, adaptation to different environments might cause differences between populations in the way individuals tend to look, smell, and behave.
In turn, these differences might cause individuals from different populations to avoid mating with one another, or hybrids exhibit reduced fitness if mating occurs. Thus, the populations cease exchanging genes, thereby diverging into separate species because of the adaptive changes that occurred via natural selection. More specifically, ecological speciation is defined as the process by which barriers to gene flow evolve between populations as a result of ecologically-based divergent selection between environments.
This process makes some simple predictions. For example, ecologically-divergent pairs of populations should exhibit greater reproductive isolation than ecologically-similar pairs of populations of similar age Funk Figure 4 illustrates an example that supports this prediction.
Other predictions are that traits involved in divergent adaptation will also cause reproductive isolation, and that levels of gene flow in nature will decrease as ecological differences between populations increase.
Figure 4 Ecological speciation in host-plant associated populations of Timema cristinae walking-stick insects individual populations feed on either the Ceanothus spinosus host plant or on Adenostoma fasciculatum. Pairs of populations feeding on the same host plant species, but in different geographic localities, are ecologically similar and assumed to not be subject to divergent selection.
In contrast, pairs of populations feeding on different host plant species are ecologically divergent and subject to divergent selection. This pattern is independent from neutral genetic divergence, a proxy for time since divergence. A current debate is whether sexual selection can lead to speciation in the absence of ecological divergence van Doorn et al. Indeed, compelling examples that implicate an important role of sexual selection leading to new species sometimes also involve the evolution of different signals used in mate-selection among populations in different ecological contexts, such as light environment Seehausen et al.
Here, signals used in mate-selection become adapted to new ecological environments where the transmission of these traits is more perceptible or audible in a new habitat. Another mechanism of speciation that involves chance events is speciation by polyploidization.
Polyploidy, or the presence of three or more complete sets of chromosomes, has been documented in a wide variety of taxa. Because polyploidy can lead to hybrid infertility, it is viewed as a mechanism that can rapidly lead to the formation of new species, potentially without selection for the divergence of other characters. Recent advances in genomics now allow such studies to be taken to the genome-wide level, where biologists can examine hundreds of thousands of gene regions, rather than just a handful.
A genomic island is any gene region, be it a single nucleotide or an entire chromosome, which exhibits significantly greater differentiation than expected under neutrality i. The metaphor thus draws parallels between genetic differentiation observed along a chromosome and the topography of oceanic islands and the contiguous sea floor through which they are connected. Following this metaphor, sea level represents the threshold above which observed differentiation is significantly greater than expected by neutral evolution alone.
Thus, an island is composed of both directly selected and tightly linked loci. Major remaining questions concern the size, number and distribution i. Clear answers to these questions will likely require experimental studies that measure selection at the genomic level to directly quantify how selection acts on the genome.
Nevertheless, the integration of geographic, ecological, and new genomic approaches is likely to yield new insight into speciation over the coming decades. See text for details. Divergent natural selection : Selection that acts in contrasting directions between two populations, usually with reference to ecological differences between their environments e. Ecological speciation : A speciation process in which divergent natural selection drives the evolution of reproductive incompatibility i.
Mutation-order speciation : A speciation process in which different and incompatible mutations alleles fix in separate populations that are experiencing similar selective regimes. Dobzhansky-Muller Incompatibility : Hybrid dysfunction arising from negative interactions epistasis between alleles at two or more loci: an allelic substitution at a locus causes no reduction in fitness on its own genetic background, but leads to reduced fitness when placed on the alternative background.
Genomic Island : A region of the genome where differentiation between populations is stronger than expected in the absence of divergent selection stronger than occurs via purely neutral processes such as genetic drift alone. Natural selection : Differential survival of classes of entities such as alleles which differ in some characteristic s. Sexual selection : Differential reproductive success of classes of entities such as alleles which differ in some characteristic s. Reproductive Isolation : Genetically-based differences between populations which reduce or prevent genetic exchange between them i.
Darwin, C. London, UK: John Murray, Feder, J. Genetic differentiation between sympatric host races of Rhagoletis pomonella. Nature , 61—64 Funk, D. Isolating a role for natural selection in speciation: Host adaptation and sexual isolation in Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles. Evolution 52 , — Maan, M.
Mechanisms of species divergence through visual adaptation and sexual selection: Perspectives from a cichlid model system. Current Zoology 56 , — Mallet, J. Space, sympatry and speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22 , — Mani, G. Mutation order — A major stochastic process in evolution. Mayr, E. Systematics and the Origin of Species. The Evolutionary Synthesis. Niemiller, M. Recent divergence with gene flow in Tennessee cave salamanders Plethodontidae: Gyrinophilus inferred from gene genealogies.
Molecular Ecology 17 , — Nosil, P. Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature , — Ecological explanations for incomplete speciation.
Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence. Molecular Ecology 18 , — Panhuis, T. Sexual selection and speciation. Ramsey, J. Pathways, mechanisms and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 29 , — Ritchie, M. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38 , 79— Rundle, H. Ecological speciation. Ecology Letters 8 , — Schluter, D. Ecology and the origin of species.
Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science , — Seehausen, O. Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Turner, T. Genomic islands of speciation in Anopheles gambiae. PLoS Biology 3 , e On the origin of species by natural and sexual selection. Via, S. Sympatric speciation in animals: The ugly duckling grows up.
The Hardy-Weinberg Principle.
0コメント